Absolute novelty is a requirement for patentability in Honduras. There are some exceptions to the absolute novelty bar establishing that disclosure of the invention by the inventor or assignee within a 12-month period prior to the filing of the Honduran application, or the recognised priority, does not constitute a novelty bar, provided that a statement regarding the date, place and means of disclosure is filed together with the Honduran application. Means of disclosure include a trade show, a published article, sales of the product, and so on. Publication of a patent application or issuance of a patent by a foreign Patent Office are the only means of disclosure excluded from the foregoing.
A patent must also have inventive level in view of the prior art.
The standard for determining whether a patent is inventive in view of the prior art is defined in articles 4, 6, 12 and others of the Honduran Industrial Property Law. These articles establish that an inventive activity is a creative process the results of which are not apparent from the state of the art to a person with technical knowledge in that field.
Patents of Invention (Traditional and PCT National Phase)
Utility Models
Designs
Identical voluntary and compulsory licence requirements apply to foreign and national patents. In that understanding, there are no restrictions on the contractual terms by which a patent owner is permitted to license a patent. According to the Law, a licence agreement must be recorded with the Patent Office in order for the same to be enforceable against third parties. A duly registered licensee will be entitled to exercise legal action to protect the patent rights, as if he or she were the holder, unless otherwise agreed. The working of a patent by a duly registered licensee will be deemed to be worked by its holder.
The following will not be considered as an invention, and in virtue of this will be excluded from patent protection:
Patent litigation both at the administrative (initial) and judiciary levels has grown steadily over the past five years. It is not related to a specific industry, but cases relating to the pharmaceutical industry are more numerous.
Several administrative sanctions can be imposed on a person found to have infringed a patent. These range from a fine to penal sanctions in the event of recidivism. The affected party may also bring an additional claim for damages and lost profit, in a civil law action. Damages and lost profit start accruing from the date on which the existence of an infringement can be proven. Honduran law tends to provide fair compensation to the affected party.
Injunctive relief is available and one or more of the following measures shall be requested:
i the cessation of the acts that infringe the rights;
ii the indemnification from the damages suffered;
iii the seizure of the objects resulting from the infraction, and of the means which had predominantly served to commit the infraction;
iv the prohibition of the import or export of the products, materials or means referred in (iii) above;
v the withdrawal of the objects or means referred in (iii) above from the commercial circuits, or their destruction, when appropriate;
vi the attribution in property of the objects or means referred in (iii) above. In this case the value of the assets will be imputed to the amount of the damages; and
vii the necessary measures to avoid the continuation or repetition of the infraction, including the destruction of the seized means compliant the (iii) above.
A bond will be required from the plaintiff prior to issuing the provisional injunctions needed to carry out any of the measures listed above. This bond has the goal to warrant damages to the defendant.
No. There are no precise plans to join the Madrid Protocol. Honduras is a signatory of the TRIPS agreement.
Marking is not mandatory. The benefits of marking a mark as registered are mainly expanded recognition by consumers and competitors.
Once a registration is obtained trademark protection is more or less straightforward in Honduras. The significant backlog at the Honduran Trademarks Office has been significantly reduced in the past four years. Trademark owners face greater challenges when trying to enforce rights before civil courts, which usually lack sufficient knowledge on the matter.
Yes. A licence agreement must be recorded in order to produce effects against third parties and be recognised by the Honduran government.
The creation of the IP specialised unit of the General Attorneys Office has been an important development in combating counterfeiting in Honduras. This unit works fairly well and if the owners of infringed rights formalise the respective actions, they can count with expedited results at fairly reasonable costs.
According to Honduran law, a mark will be considered as used in Honduras when the products or services identified by the same can be found in the market under that mark in the quantity and regularity that normally correspond, having in mind the size of the Honduran market, the nature of the products or services in mention and the form in which such are usually commercialised.
The so-called rehabilitation (non-use tax): a registered mark that is not being used in Honduras will not be cancelled on the grounds of non-use (even if not used in Honduras in any way) if the trademark owner has paid the rehabilitation (non-use) tax.
Protection of trademarks is territorial. Use abroad alone will not award trademark rights. Notoriety abroad only is not sufficient to defend a trademark in Honduras.
Yes. Oppositions can be filed up to 30 working days (Monday to Friday) counted from the publication of a trademark in the official Gazette. The deadline to file an opposition cannot be extended.
Not necessary. It can be acquired, however, rather inexpensively.
Contributory copyright infringement is not expressly regulated in the Law. However, if the prior knowledge of the infringing activities on the part of the facilitator can be proven, then it may be subject to similar fines and penalties as the main infringer by a court of law.
Alternative dispute resolution methods are available in Honduras but they are not commonly used. This may change in the future as the very recently enacted revisions and additions to the Investment Law (July 2011) require the mandatory use of alternative dispute resolution methods before filing suits on intellectual property matters. This provision does not affect complaints before the General Attorneys Office special IP Unit.
No. A preliminary project to be able to record trademarks before Customs is in the making.
The Trademark Law Treaty (TLT) may become effective in Honduras within the next 12 to 18 months.
The Honduran Trademarks Office has stated that although notoriety abroad is not enough in most cases, under certain circumstances (it is not clear which certain circumstances) a trademark that is not used in the country (and therefore could not be deemed as notorious in strict application of the precepts of the Law) has some special characteristics or reputation that could give ground to the authority to deem it as notorious even if not so to a significant segment of consumers. (This decision was rendered in connection with very expensive upscale luxury goods not sold in Honduras but identified by a mark to which, notwithstanding such facts, the Trademarks Office conceded the status of notorious).
The access to personal data solely shall proceed by court decree or at the request of the individual whose personal information are contained in such information or its representatives or successors.
Prohibition of release of information
No one may force another to provide personal information which may lead to discrimination or cause patrimonial or moral damage or risk to people.
Under our laws, the following is considered confidential personal data: all data related to ethnic or racial origin; physical, moral or emotional characteristics, home address, telephone number, including, particular email address, political affiliation, religious or philosophical beliefs, health status, physical or mental, personal or family heritage and any other related to honour, privacy, family or self-image.
The National and Insurance Banking Law has special regulations and is aimed at strengthening the Credit Risk Bureau. Some of the prohibitions, particularly those relating to home address, telephone number and some others, do not apply in these cases.
No, but it is generally done as a result of self-regulation.
The exportation of personal data to another jurisdiction is prohibited, unless expressly authorised by the individual.
© Law Business Research Ltd 1998-2012. All rights reserved.
Company No.: 03281866
IMPORTANT: Please read our Terms & conditions.