Costa Rica has a structured, independent and impartial judicial system. Its legal system is based on civil law and, hence, precedents are not as important as the application of the written laws enacted.
The court system does not make any difference between national and foreign entities regarding whether a national is able to sue a foreign or vice versa. Notwithstanding the matter shall refer to Costa Rican laws or jurisdiction. Both parties are allowed and have the same rights under the law. Considering the nature of the lawsuit, the judge may order precautionary measures as established by the Civil Procedure Code.
The most common types of litigation consist on labour lawsuits (resulting from layoffs or employment related matters) and civil claims (derived from breach of contract or ordinary debts).
If the dispute that generated a lawsuit is also sanctioned by criminal laws, the parties are able to file a claim seeking punishment. The evidence and rulings obtained in this kind of lawsuits could be used to support other claims.
No. Costa Rican laws do allow juries for any type of trial.
Costa Rican courts strongly encourage conciliation between the parties. This action is promoted in every litigation proceeding and takes place before evacuating the evidence offered by the parties.
The parties are totally free to determine in a contract the law and forum provisions applicable for the solution of their disputes. Nevertheless, to ensure the proper implementation of such stipulations the parties should not make conflicting options (for example subject the resolution of a dispute to Costa Rican courts but under foreign laws, because the interpretation and scope of the law will not be properly handled by our judges).
Other options can be executed; however they will be more cumbersome for judges in theirs correct implementation and execution.
Costa Rica allows the parties to resolve their disputes through the court system or arbitration proceedings. For this purpose, outside the civil provision as stated by the Civil Code and the Civil Procerdure Code there is also specific arbitration law and governance which was undertaken with regards to the UNCITRAL model in 2011 and subjects the Republic of Costa Rica to said precepts.
The arbitration awards rendered under these laws may be enforced in our courts and internationally.
Yes, the courts must recognise attorney-client privilege at all cases, regardless of whether it is independent or in-house lawyers.
Costa Rican laws have the following rules in this regard: in labour and civil lawsuits the proceeding and hearings are private, but at any point any lawyer can review the file; and in criminal lawsuits the proceeding and file are private (only accessed by the parties), but in principle the hearings are public, except for sexual offences or offences that involve minors. Family lawsuits are a mixture of these two categories, with private proceeding, file and hearings.
Yes. Because our Civil Procedural Code provides a previous motion/objection for this situation. When the results of the process may affect other parties besides the defendant, after the filing of the motion, the judge can require to the plaintiff to extend the lawsuit against those other parties (joint litigation motion), who will be forced to join the process.
To obtain the authorisation to enforce a foreign judgment the party must file an exequatur proceeding. The proceeding is to meet the following requirements:
The time given may vary depending on the nature of the lawsuit and whether the party is a national or foreign entity. Based on these circumstances, this time will lapse between 10 and 30 days if the defendant is a local person. Yet, if it is a foreign entity the law entitles the judge to give a maximum of four months to answer a complaint (extraordinary term).
A first-instance judgment can be both quick and easy, or a big headache for the interested parties. Depending on the nature of the process, complexity of the discussion, abundance of evidences and the penchant of the parties, a process could take from one to four years.
That is correct. The Costa Rican legal system requires the parties to submit amongst its initial pleadings all facts, arguments and supporting evidence to the claim.
There is the possibility of filing for discovery prior to trial through which the interested party may obtain evidence to substantiate its claim (usually documents held by the counterparty or the confession of this party).
The Costa Rican court system established in terms of burden of proof that anyone who makes a claim is required to prove it. Thus, the plaintiff must provide all the evidence in support of his/her claim, minimising those cases where the judge should ask a third party the display or delivery of documents (usually this is limited to public records, because as it is known private entities rarely attend these calls).
When a party offers a witness in a lawsuit, that witness will constitute immediately common evidence. As a consequence, the judge, party or any other interested person of the lawsuit could examine the witness about the facts and take advance of his or her statement.
The evidence filed by the parties is evaluated by the judge using his/her good judgment.
As a result of our court system, all hearings must be celebrated at a trial. Under no circumstances a hearing can take place before or without a trial.
Additionally, expert witness testimony must be offered by the party since the initial pleading, but usually the judge schedule their hearing after all evidences were received and disposed.
Depending on the written instrument, the party may file an ordinary process or just an execution process.
Our jurisdiction allows minority shareholders to initiate several legal actions to resolve any disputes arising against other shareholders or the company itself
The person that holds a lien on a vessel is comparable with any other person that has the same right over any other vehicle. Thus, the breach of the agreement or non-compliance of the agreed terms will allow the complying party the enforcement of the security or lien through a proceso prendario, which consists of a simple enforcement process that allows the plaintiff to seize, capture and auction the asset.
As mentioned above, the party holding a security interest in real property and personal property could file a number of processes.
Within these proceedings, the creditor could ask for the seizure, capture, foreclosure and auction of the assets.
Costa Rican labour courts most frequent litigations are of two types: those that pretend the collection of termination payment or indemnity (after resignation or dismiss of the employee), which usually includes notice, severance, vacation, Christmas bonus as well as any other labour right not recognised during the employment relationship, and those that pretend any payment or indemnity as a consequence of a labour accident or risk suffered by the employee.
No, class actions are not allowed by our laws. However, different persons can join together to file a claim against the same defendant, but our laws ask for such cases to specify the identity of parties and the purpose and claims.
Government-owned or controlled entities do not enjoy great privileges when they are involved in a commercial or administrative litigation. The most important privileges consist of the existence of a specialised court for the knowledge and resolution of administrative litigation as well as collection proceedings where such institutions are involved. Additionally, administrative litigation has special procedural law that contains different terms to answer the lawsuit, file motions and exercise other legal actions, contains different opportunities and limitations for evidence, the possibility to file some injunctive reliefs to avoid severe damages, characterised for oral and faster proceedings, among others features.
All kind of lawsuits (criminal, commercial, administrative and labour) allow the application of injunctive relief on an emergency basis. Injunctive relief can be requested by the party before the initial pleading as well as during the respective lawsuit, if applicable based on special circumstances. Those reliefs are usual in criminal and civil lawsuits.
Arbitration proceedings request that injunctive relief should be filed before courts at any time of the arbitration (before, during or after), because judges are the only entitled authorities to recognise them. However, when a final award has been rendered, injunctive reliefs are not necessary because the interested party could proceed immediately with a provisional execution of the award.
In order that the parties can file a claim and obtain a solution to their dispute, they do not have to pay any court fees, except for the tax stamps required by law in the initial pleading. Additionally, civil claims require the parties to have attorneys that represent them or certify the signature of the party in each pleading, which at the end represents a cost of the lawsuit.
Finally, other expenses such as fees for experts, executioners, publication of legal notices and others may arise during the process.
Non-residents can file lawsuits without assuming additional costs or any particular bond. However, if the non-resident is the defendant, the judge can ask him or her to appoint a representative with sufficient power of attorney to continue with the process.
In labour matters, if the defendant is a non-resident the judge can also ask for a security that could satisfy the results of the lawsuit (to keep enough assets in the country, a bank deposit or any other guarantee).
Costa Rican law only recognises the compensation for any direct, immediate, predictable and measurable damages. In its initial pleading the party must quantify and detail the damages that were caused, but is at sole discretion of the judge its acceptance and determination.
Punitive damages are available, however judges usually reject them because they prefer to base their payments in material damages, defaulted debts, reduced earnings, etc.
According to article 221 of Civil Procedural Code, the losing party is liable for the legal fees and costs assumed by the counter-party.
Regarding the legal fees, these are determined by law, so depending on the nature of the lawsuit and its estimation, the judge will determine the amount to be reimbursed for this item. As for costs, these must be liquidated and proven by the interested party, otherwise they will be rejected by the judge.
However, article 221 of Civil Procedural Code has some exceptions, the most important being when the lawsuit contains exaggerated claims; both parties have lost in part the lawsuit or when they have litigated with good faith. If the judge considers one of these situations were in the lawsuit, he or she can order each party to assume and pay for their own legal fees and costs.
The parties may include provisions in their contracts that liquidate in advance any damages arising from its non-compliance. In such case, if the provision exists, is effective and the party demonstrate the failure or non-compliance of the counterparty, the judge must recognise such provision and enforce it according to the scope given by the parties.
In order to appeal a court decision, the party must submit the appeal in the next three to five days (depending on the kind of resolution they are challenging) from the service of the resolution. The appeal must be filed before the same judge that rendered the resolution or decision and once received the judge will send the file to the appeal court. In civil matters a party can express their arguments since the beginning (in the same writing that he used to file the appeal) or within the period of time granted by the superior court.
Additionally, depending on the amount claimed at the case, the parties will have a final opportunity to challenge the court decisions before the Supreme Court of Justice, nevertheless this legal remedy applies only for limited cases and full of formalities.
Although it sounds strange, it is usual that the appellate courts modify decisions.
As well challenging decisions from private entities, courts can also challenge administrative decisions made by our government institutions.
© Law Business Research Ltd 1998-2012. All rights reserved.
Company No.: 03281866
IMPORTANT: Please read our Terms & conditions.